United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2026

Marvin Rocael Godinez Garcia v. Jeremy Casey, Warden, Imperial Regional...

Marvin Rocael Godinez Garcia v. Jeremy Casey, Warden, Imperial Regional...
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided January 22, 2026
Marvin Rocael Godinez Garcia v. Jeremy Casey, Warden, Imperial Regional...

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARVIN ROCAEL GODINEZ GARCIA, Case No.: 26-cv-187-JES-DEB 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. § 2241 Jeremy CASEY, Warden, Imperial Regional Detention Center, Calexico, California; Daniel A. BRIGHTMAN, [ECF No. 1] Acting Field Office Director, San Diego Office of Detention and Removal, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement; Todd M. LYONS, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Sirce OWEN, Acting Director for Executive Office for Immigration Review; Kristi NOEM, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Pam BONDI, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents.

25 Before the Court is Petitioner Marvin Rocael Godinez Garcia’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which was filed on January 13, 2026. ECF No. 1. Pursuant to the Court’s Order to Show Cause, Respondents filed a Response to the Petition. ECF No. 4.

1 Respondents acknowledged that Petitioner must be considered detained under 8 ||U.S.C. § 1226(a), pursuant to the final judgment entered in Maldonado Bautista v. || Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2025 WL 3289861 (C.D.

4 ||Cal. Nov. 20, 2025). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Petition as follows: 5 (1) The Court ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond 6 determination hearing, under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), within seven days of 7 this Order. At the hearing, Respondents may not deny Petitioner bond 8 on the basis that he is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2).

9 (2) If Respondents fail to provide Petitioner a bond hearing within the 10 specified time period or pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), the Court 11 ORDERS Petitioner’s immediate release; 12 (3) Respondents are ORDERED to File a Notice of Compliance within five 13 days of providing Petitioner with a bond redetermination hearing, 14 including apprising the Court of the results of the hearing; and 15 (4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE the suit after receipt of 16 Respondents’ Notice.

17 IT IS SO ORDERED.

18 || Dated: January 22, 2026 19 Soar Str, 20 Honorable James E. Simmons Jr. 1 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.