Julio Adrian Ruiz Zazueta v. Todd M. Lyons, Director, Immigration and Customs...
Trial Court Opinion
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JULIO ADRIAN RUIZ ZAZUETA, Case No.: 3:26-cv-00149-BTM-MSB 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITION 13 v. FOR THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TODD M. LYONS, Director, [ECF NO. 1] Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security; JOHN RATHMAN, Warden of Imperial Regional Detention Center; PAM BONDI, Attorney General, Department of Justice; and KRISTI NOEM, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, 21 Respondents.
24 Pending before the Court is Julio Adrian Ruiz Zazueta’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Respondents agree that Ruiz Zazueta appears to be a member of the class granted relief in Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, 2025 WL 27 3713987 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2025), judgment entered sub nom. Maldonado Bautista v. Noem, 2025 WL 3678485 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2025). (ECF No. 4, at 2.) Based on that, 1 acknowledge that Ruiz Zazueta “is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and is entitled 2 an order from this Court directing a bond hearing be held pursuant to 8 U.S.C. || § 1226(a).” Ud.) The Court agrees and holds that Ruiz Zazueta is entitled to a bond hearing |/under Section 1226(a). The Court also holds that Ruiz Zazueta is independently entitled 5 the writ of habeas corpus for the same reasons discussed in the Court’s recent decisions: 6 Petitioner is a long-term resident of the United States. He was apprehended in 7 the interior of the United States, not near the border or a port of entry. He is not an applicant for admission. He may not be denied a bond hearing based 8 on Respondents’ contention that his case falls within Section 1225.
9 || Garcia-Donis, 2025 WL 3467385, at *1 (quoting Amaya, 2025 WL 3182998, at *2). (See || ECF No. 1, at 3.)
11 The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED on the first claim and the writ |}is ISSUED. The Respondents are enjoined from detaining Ruiz Zazueta under 8 U.S.C. ||§ 1225. The Respondents must also provide him with an individualized bond hearing || before a neutral immigration judge under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within fourteen (14) days of || the entry of this order. The Respondents shall not deny his bond on the basis that 8 U.S.C. 16 1225(b) requires mandatory detention. In the absence of a bond hearing as ordered, the || Respondents shall release Ruiz Zazueta from custody.
18 The remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice as moot. The hearing on || January 30, 2026, is VACATED. The parties shall file a statement as to the satisfaction || of the writ by February 6, 2025, at 4 p.m. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the writ.
21 The Petitioner may move for an award of fees within thirty (30) days of the entry of ||this Order. The Respondents shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the 23 motion and the Petitioner may reply within seven (7) days of the filing of the opposition.
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 Dated: January 22, 2026 = 26 Honore Barry Ted Helena 27 United States District Judge 2 □ □□
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.