Jaime Gabriel Morales Reyes v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of the United...
Trial Court Opinion
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAIME GABRIEL MORALES REYES, Case No. 26-cv-00528-BAS 14 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION 15 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE PAM BONDI, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Respondents.
20 Presently before the Court are a Petition and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum filed on January 27, 2026. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) The Petition alleges Petitioner was arrested on January 27, 2026, and has not been presented for an initial appearance in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum directing Respondents to immediately present Petitioner to a magistrate judge for arraignment.
26 Upon review, the Petition and Application do not demonstrate that Petitioner is entitled to relief. Cf. United States v. Pimental, 755 F.3d 1095, 1103–04 (9th Cir. 2014) (finding a four-day delay in presentment over a holiday weekend was unreasonable and ||unnecessary). Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Petition 2 Application. (ECF Nos. 1-2.) In the event that Petitioner is not arraigned by January 3 2026, Petitioner may renew the Petition and Application. Further, the Clerk of Court || shall serve this Order on the U.S. Attorney’s Office and close the case.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 ~ || DATED: January 28, 2026 (yatta Bahar □□ Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge 8 United States District Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.