United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2026

Marlon Castillo Espada v. John Doe, Warden, John Doe, Field Office Director,...

Marlon Castillo Espada v. John Doe, Warden, John Doe, Field Office Director,...
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided January 23, 2026
Marlon Castillo Espada v. John Doe, Warden, John Doe, Field Office Director,...

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARLON CASTILLO ESPADA, Case No. 5:25-cv-02983-JWH-KES 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL 13 v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. JOHN DOE, Warden, MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN DOE, Field Office Director, TODD M. LYONS, Acting Director, KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of 16 Homeland Security, and PAMELA JO BONDI, U.S. Attorney 17 General, 18 Respondents.

1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition of Petitioner Marlon Castillo Espada,1 the objections of Respondents John Doe, Warden; John Doe, Field Office Director; Todd M. Lyons, Acting Director; Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security; and Pamela Jo Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, to the initial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,2 and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.3 The Court has engaged in a de novo review of the issues raised in the objections. Based upon that review, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 10 1. The final report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.4 12 2. The Petition is GRANTED.

13 3. Respondents are DIRECTED to RELEASE Petitioner Marlon Castillo Espada from custody FORTHWITH, subject to the order of supervision that governed his release prior to his October 23, 2025, detention.

16 4. Respondents are ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining Espada unless and until they follow the procedures set forth in 8 18 C.F.R. §§ 241.4(l) and 241.13(i).

23 1 Petition [ECF No. 1].

24 2 Response to Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 20].

25 3 Final Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 21].

26 4 As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Espada is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability in order to appeal to the United States Court of Appeals in this case. See Harrison v. Ollison, 519 F.3d 952, 958 1 5. Respondents are DIRECTED to file no later than January 30, 2026, a Status Report that advises the Court regarding Espada’s custody status.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

VM 5\|| Dated: January 23, 2026 6 NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE &

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.