Erlinda Martinez v. Walmart et al.
Trial Court Opinion
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERLINDA MARTINEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00149-KES-FRS (SKO) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 12 v. (Doc. 52) WALMART et al., Defendants.
18 On January 12, 2026, the appearing parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 52.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: January 13, 2026 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.