United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2026

Juan Manuel Cisneros Mata v. Warden of Golden State Annex Detention Facility

Juan Manuel Cisneros Mata v. Warden of Golden State Annex Detention Facility
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 15, 2026
Juan Manuel Cisneros Mata v. Warden of Golden State Annex Detention Facility

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JUAN MANUEL CISNEROS MATA, No. 1:26-cv-0189-DC-CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER WARDEN OF GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, Respondent.

18 Petitioner, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainee currently representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a motion requesting appointment of counsel. Petitioner also paid the filing fee. The application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

23 The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the interests of justice require appointment of counsel for petitioner. See 18 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other types of habeas corpus petitions including § 2241 petitions.

1 | U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983).

2 || Therefore, petitioner will be appointed counsel.

3 Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of | constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be served with the § 2241 petition. See 28 U.S.C. || § 2243. Petitioner’s counsel, once appointed, shall meet and confer with respondent’s counsel || regarding a briefing schedule for this case.

7 In accordance with the above, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 8 1. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED.

9 2. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED.

10 3. Within 7 (seven) days from the date of this order, the appointing authority for the | Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to | Lisa Kennison, Courtroom Deputy for Chief Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, via email at | [email protected], and the docket will be updated to reflect counsel’s appointment. If || counsel is not a member of the Eastern District of California Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”) Panel, || the Court hereby authorizes them to serve as pro hac vice CJA counsel for petitioner for the || duration of the proceedings in this Court pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(1). If counsel is not || admitted to practice before the Eastern District of California court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3005 || and 3006A and this District’s CJA Plan, General Order 671, § XV.C.1.g as applied here, the || Court hereby authorizes said counsel’s pro hac vice admission to practice before this court for the || duration of the proceedings, nunc pro tunc to the date the appointing authority first contacted || counsel about this appointment.

22 4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order and a copy of the petition on the || Federal Defender, Attention: Habeas Appointment.

24 5. New counsel for petitioner shall meet and confer with opposing counsel on a briefing || schedule and jointly file that schedule with the court within fourteen (14) days of this order.

26 | Dated: January 15, 2026 / ae / a ly. ae 28 matao189.110aimm UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.