Rayon Jones v. J. Quiring

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RAYON JONES, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-1933-TLN-JDP (P) 13 v. J. QUIRING, ORDER 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Rayon Jones (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On December 4, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. This deadline has passed and neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”).

28 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by | the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 4, 2025, (ECF No. 35) are 4 ADOPTED in full; and 5 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive relief, (ECF No. 30), is DENIED.

6 | Date: January 14, 2026 . ? TROY L. NUNLEY 10 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE