Henry Adams v. Solano State Prison, et al.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY ADAMS, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-2802-TLN-JDP (P) 13 v. SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al., ORDER 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Henry Adams (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20 On December 4, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. This deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”).

28 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by | the record and by the proper analysis.

2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 4, 2025, (ECF No. 20), are 4 ADOPTED in full; 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim, failure to 6 prosecute, and for failure to comply with court orders for the reasons stated in the July 7 30, 2025 order (ECF No. 18); and 8 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

9 | Date: January 14, 2026 11 7, 12 TROY L. NUNLEY 13 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE