United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2026

Damon Hudson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Damon Hudson v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 15, 2026
Damon Hudson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 MARGARET LEHRKIND SBCA # 314717 Lehrkind Law Office, P.C.

3 2625 Alcatraz Ave, # 208 Berkeley, CA 94705 Tel: 510-590-1907 [email protected] 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAMON HUDSON, CASE NO.: 2:25-cv-01312-AC Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND 11 PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND vs. EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; [PROPOSED] COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ORDER 14 Defendant The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby agree that attorney fees in the amount of $7,127.07 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs of $0, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Such attorney fees shall be subject to verification that Plaintiff has no debt that qualifies for offset, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010).

If the U.S. Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not subject to any offset allowed under the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check or electronic funds transfer for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, Margaret Lehrkind, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to her. See Exhibit – STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER - 1 Retainer Agreement. If Plaintiff has a debt, then any remaining funds after offset shall be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s address.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA.

13 DATE: January 14, 2026 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Margaret Lehrkind MARGARET LEHRKIND 17 Attorney for Plaintiff DATE: January 14, 2026 By: /s/ Oscar Gonzalez de Llano * OSCAR GONZALEZ DE LLANO *As authorized via email on x 20 Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant

STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER - 2 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER || Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act 4 and Expenses (the “Stipulation”), > IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-SEVEN DOLLARS AND SEVEN CENTS ($7,127.07) as authorized by the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and ZERO dollars ($0.00), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 |}DATE: January 14, 2026 7 A / 13 ALLISON CLAIRE 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND || EXPENSES PURUSANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER - 3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.