Ernest Godfrey Logan, Jr. v. Albertson’s Store #4131, et al.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERNEST GODFREY LOGAN, Jr., Case No. 2:25-cv-3553-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALBERTSON’S STORE #4131, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action be brought in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

26 In this case, all defendants reside, and plaintiff’s claims arose, in Los Angeles County, which is in the Central District of California. ECF No. 1 at 2, 35-36; see 28 U.S.C. § 84(c).

28 Thus, this action should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District | of California. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong | district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 | (D.C. Cir. 1974).

4 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States | District Court for the Central District of California.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ January 15, 2026 | \ sa 9 awe D. PE i ERSON 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE