Estate of Samuel
Opinion of the Court
Deceased died in this city and county, October 20, 1878, and letters of administration were granted to Wm. Doolan, Public Administrator of this city and county.
C. B. Rutherford, Public Administrator of Alameda County, petitions for the revocation of the letters to Doolan, and that no further administration be had, on the ground that deceased was at the time of his death a resident of Alameda County.
Pacts: Deceased had been for years a resident of Liver-more, Alameda County. He was a peddler, having a small store-room as headquarters, and travelled through the country with his wares. In 1866 he purchased a small tract of land, and carried on farming in a small way; had some horses and
By the law of this State, a person cannot have two places of residence; he does not lose his residence at one place until he has acquired a residence at another; residence is a mixed question of act and intent; the Political Code defines a residence to be “the place where one remains when not called elsewhere for labor or other special or temporary purpose, and to which he returns in seasons of repose.”
I am of opinion that Samuel did not change his place of residence from Alameda County to this city and county. The oath which he took to get his name on the Great Eegister here was a false oath, and his statements as to his residence here were false statements, for the purpose of imposing upon the society which he wished to join. He did not return to San Francisco “in seasons of repose,” but whenever he was here, he was here for temporary purposes only.
The petition of C. B. Butherford for revocation of the letters to Wm. Doolan, and that no further administration be had in this city and county, must be granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.