Buckley v. Carlisle
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Balch v. Jones (Cal. 1882)
- Pueblo v. Verdejo Meléndez (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1963)
- Mosher v. Helfend (Cal. Ct. App. 1935)
- De Rigne v. Hart (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)
- State Ex Rel. Cole v. District Court (Mont. 1927)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This was an action for the recovery of personal property. The jury found specially that the plaintiff and defendant were partners in reference to the subject-matter of the suit. The mere statement of the finding is sufficient to show that the plaintiff had no right to recover. The property was as rightfully in the possession of the defendant, as it would have been in the plaintiffs; and there being in the bill no allegation of partnership, and no attempt to seek a dissolution and an account, it follows that there was no relief, to which the plaintiff was entitled; and the judgment is therefore affirmed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.