California Supreme Court, 1852

Bates v. Visher

Bates v. Visher
California Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1852 · Heydeneeldt
2 Cal. 355
Bates v. Visher

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Heydeneeldt, Justice.

The error relied on to reverse this judgment, is, that the trial was by referees, and not by a jury, and that the reference was not authorized. On looking into the record, it appears that there is an entry upon the minutes, which recites that “ the parties came by their attorneys, and defendant by his attorney, moved the Court, that the cause be referred,” &c. Thus the reference was made on the appellant’s motion, and in one of the modes pointed out by law “ by oral consent in . open Court entered on the minutes.”

It is only necessary to state thus much to show that the ob*358jection is entirely unsupported. Indeed the case must be treated as a delay case, and the judgment affirmed with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Anderson, Justice, concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.