Toothaker v. Cornwall

California Supreme Court
Toothaker v. Cornwall, 3 Cal. 144 (Cal. 1853)
Heydenfeldt

Toothaker v. Cornwall

Opinion of the Court

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.

The act of 1851, which makes the fourth day of July a non-juridical day, by its terms confines its operation expressly to bills, checks, and notes, made after the passage of the act.

In this case, the note in controversy was made before the passage of the act, and is not within its provision, consequently it fell due on the 1st, and was payable on the 4th day of July. It is not pretended by the plaintiff that notice of its nonpayment was given on the 4th or afterwards, and the notice on the 3d was premature and ineffectual.

The judgment is reversed, and the case remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
TOOTHAKER v. CORNWALL
Status
Published
Syllabus
A promissory note was made before the Act of 1851 (which makes the 4th of July anon-juridical day), which fell due on the 1st of July, and was payable on the 4th. Held, that notice of non-payment on the 3d was premature, and ineffectual to charge the endorser.