Backus, Davis & Co. v. Minor
Backus, Davis & Co. v. Minor
Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was, at the close of the argument, delivered by
Wells, Justice, concurring.
The re-argument of this cause has not induced me to change my opinion.
It is true that an account after payment may be opened ^nd surcharged on the ground of mistake, but the calculation] of interest by the plaintiffs in this case can in no sense be called a mistake. It was a deliberate, methodical plan of doing business, according to a well-comprehended rule, and there is no authority or reason, at law or in equity, by which they are entitled to any relief.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- BACKUS, DAVIS & CO. v. ALLEN MINOR
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Upon a money demand bearing interest, on which payments have been made after maturity, the proper method of computing interest is stated by Chancellor Kent, in Connecticut v. Jackson, 1 Johns. Ch. Rep. Í3. But where an account has been stated by the plaintiff, charging interest both on the debt and the payments, and rendered to the defendant, and no objection made thereto, within a reasonable time, it is the same as an agreement that the interest should be computed accordingly. When the dealings of the parties extended through a period of more than two years, during which time several accounts were rendered by plaintiffs to defendant, and the same mode of computing interest was pursued throughout, this mode was held to be binding upon them.