Backus, Davis & Co. v. Minor
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mitchell v. City of Los Angeles (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)
- McConnell v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)
- Big Bear Properties, Inc. v. Gherman (Cal. Ct. App. 1979)
- Patillo v. Allen-West Commission Co. (8th Cir. 1904)
- Porter v. Price (8th Cir. 1897)
- Sayward v. Dexter, Horton & Co. (9th Cir. 1896)
- Auzerais v. Naglee (Cal. 1887)
- Smith v. Fox (City of New York Municipal Court 1886)
- Marye v. Strouse (United States Circuit Courts 1880)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was, at the close of the argument, delivered by
Wells, Justice, concurring.
The re-argument of this cause has not induced me to change my opinion.
It is true that an account after payment may be opened ^nd surcharged on the ground of mistake, but the calculation] of interest by the plaintiffs in this case can in no sense be called a mistake. It was a deliberate, methodical plan of doing business, according to a well-comprehended rule, and there is no authority or reason, at law or in equity, by which they are entitled to any relief.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.