Tartar v. Hall
Tartar v. Hall
3 Cal. 263
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Standard Savings Loan Association v. Acton (Okla. 1936)
- Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Acton (Okla. 1936)
- Elizalde v. Murphy (Cal. 1912)
- Freiermuth v. Steigleman (Cal. 1900)
- Stidham v. Matthews (Ark. 1874)
- Kirkaldie v. Larrabee (Cal. 1866)
- Clark v. Baker (Cal. 1860)
- Redman v. Bellamy (Cal. 1854)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
The mortgage executed by the defendant, operates an estoppel to the defence he has set up; according to well-established principles of public policy, for the security of good faith and fair dealing, a party is not allowed to controvert the declarations which he has made by deed, or to deny the enforcement of rights which he has thus attempted to confer.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.