Patten v. Ray
California Supreme Court
Patten v. Ray, 4 Cal. 287 (Cal. 1854)
Heydeneeldt, Murray
Patten v. Ray
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Court below properly decided that a foreign judgment was not * ‘ a contract, obligation or liability for the payment of money, founded on an instrument of writing executed out of this S tate, ” within tho meaning of the Statute of Limitations. We have already decided at this Term
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Cavender v. Guild, ante, 250.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PATTEN & STEWART v. RAY
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published