California Supreme Court, 1855

Tinney v. Endicott

Tinney v. Endicott
California Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1855 · Heydenfeldt
5 Cal. 102

Tinney v. Endicott

Opinion of the Court

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murray, C. J., concurred.

The third instruction asked for by defendant’s counsel, ought to have been given. The reason given for the refusal is, that a rule of the

*103Court requires counsel “to file and submit to the Court any instructions they may offer, before the argument is closed, to the jury.” But it appears by the statement that the cause was submitted without argument, so that there was no room for the operation of the rule.

For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.