People v. Davidson
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Robey (Nev. 1873)
- People v. Woods (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)
- State v. White (Iowa 1876)
- People v. Alvarado (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1936)
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Alvarado (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1936)
- State v. Jukanovich (Utah 1915)
- State v. Young (Wash. 1900)
- State v. Johnson (N.D. 1893)
- Campbell v. Commonwealth (Pa. 1877)
- Territory v. Conrad (Supreme Court of Dakota 1877)
- People v. Congleton (Cal. 1872)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
The indictment in charging Davidson and Kennedy with an assault with an intent to commit murder, and afterwards Kennedy with being an accessory, charges but one offepse. Ttie eleventh section of the Act concerning Crimes and Punishments, makes any person aiding or assisting, or advising and encouraging the perpetration of a crime, a principal, and that he or she shall be punished accordingly. Under the law of this State, the accessory is treated as a principal, and, as if the person charged as such had committed the offense. It is not error to charge the defendant as principal and accessory in the same indictment.
The verdict of the Jury which finds the defendant guilty of an “ assault with a deadly weapon, with intent to commit great bodily injury,” is regular, and we deem that it finds the defendant guilty of a public offense. Section 424, of the Act regulating Proceedings in Criminal Cases, provides—that in all cases a person may be found guilty of an offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he may be charged in the indictment.
To find the defendant guilty of an “ assault with intent to commit great bodily injury,” is necessarily included in the charge of an assault with intent to commit murder. We find no error in the record sent up.
The judgment below is therefore affirmed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.