Pinkham & McDonough v. McFarland & Elrod
Pinkham & McDonough v. McFarland & Elrod
Opinion of the Court
Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
The endorsements of the notes sued on are not denied with sufficient certainty by the answer; if they were, the defendants ought to have objected to their introduction in evidence.
The power of opening tip a case after it has been once submitted, rests in the sound discretion of the Court hearing the cause, which we will not as a general rule attempt to revise. In this case, however, the plaintiffs have beejMfc^l by the acts of the defendants, and justice requires that a ne^^HBmould be granted*
Ordered accordingly.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PINKHAM & McDONOUGH v. McFARLAND & ELROD
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- The power of opening up a case after it has been once submitted, rests in the sound discretion of the Court heating the cause, and. as a general rule will not be revised. Where one party to an action is misled by the act of the other, justice demands that a new trial should be granted.