Pierce v. Kennedy
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Loustalot v. Calkins (Cal. 1898)
- Burton & Co. v. Hansford (W. Va. 1877)
- Rothschild v. Grix (Mich. 1875)
- Ford v. Hendricks (Cal. 1868)
- Geiger v. Clark (Cal. 1859)
- Dana v. Stanfords (Cal. 1858)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Murray, C. J., concurred.
The defendants, Ford, Lathrop & Co., were guarantors upon the note which is the foundation of this action, ^heir liability, according to the decision of this Court, in Riggs v. Waldo, 2 Cal., 485, is strictly that of an indorser, and they were entitled to notice of non-payment even although the circumstance of the maker’s absence might have excused a presentment, and demand upon him. The case cited has been incor„ rectly reported; the facts in that case should appear similar to the facts in this.
The Court below was correct in granting a non-suit, and the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.