Redman v. Gulnac
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tice v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
- Cornish v. Graff (New York Supreme Court 1885)
- Addy v. Stewart (Idaho 1949)
- Nelson v. Southern Pacific Co. (Cal. 1937)
- State v. Meagher (Mo. Ct. App. 1892)
- Doyle v. United States (United States Circuit Courts 1881)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Bryan, J., concurred.
It was error, after the jury had retired, to allow them to come into Court and instruct them, in the absence of the parties or their counsels.
Such instructions will be considered important if the contrary is not shown, from the very fact that the jury have asked for them. The certificate of the Judge of the Court below is a sufficient authentication of the statement. An appellant cannot be defeated of his rights by any such proceeding. If the respondent did not think proper to file amendments, or the Judge to correct the statement, the certificate of that fact by the Judge is all that is necessary.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and new trial granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.