Cunningham v. Dorsey

California Supreme Court
Cunningham v. Dorsey, 6 Cal. 19 (Cal. 1856)
Heydenfeldt

Cunningham v. Dorsey

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The third instruction given by the District Court, at the request of the plaintiff, is clearly erroneous. The true rule of damages is the value of the labor performed, and the amount of profit which could fairly have been derived from the labor left unperformed by the act of the defendants. Although afterwards, at the defendants’ request, the Court laid down the correct rule, yet it is impossible to say that the erroneous instruction first given had no influence upon the jury. Both stood together and were of equal force, and we cannot by computation ascertain by which one the jury was controlled.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
CUNNINGHAM v. DORSEY
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
In an action for breach of contract and for hindering the plaintiff from completing his part thereof, the true measure of damages is, the value of the labor performed by plaintiff, and the profit he could fairly have derived from the labor he was prevented from performing.