Downer v. Lent
Downer v. Lent
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Murray and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
It is beyond controversy, that the power of the Board of Pilot Commissioners is quasi judicial, and they are not civilly answerable. They are public officers to whom the law has entrusted certain duties, the performance of which requires the exercise of judgment. They are unlike a ministerial officer, whose duties are well defined, and who must fail to execute them properly at his own peril.
Whenever, from the necessity of the case, the law is obliged to trust to the sound judgment and discretion of an officer, public policy demands that he should be protected from any consequences of an erroneous judgment.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DOWNER v. LENTs.
- Cited By
- 41 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- The Board of Pilot Commissioners is a quasi judicial body, entrusted with duties, the performance of which requires the exercise of judgment and discretion; and its members are not civilly answerable for their acts as such. Wherever the law is obliged to trust to tho sound judgment and discretion of an officer, public policy demands that ho should be protected from any consequences of an erroneous judgment.