Lorraine v. Long
Lorraine v. Long
6 Cal. 452
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hough v. Waters (Cal. 1866)
- Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Hathaway Baking Co. (Mass. 1940)
- Johnson v. Sun Realty Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1934)
- Engel v. Rothman (Ohio Ct. App. 1916)
- Allis v. Hall (Conn. 1904)
- McMahan v. Whelan (Or. 1904)
- Golson v. Dunlap (Cal. 1887)
- Witte v. Lockwood (Ohio 1883)
- Hill v. Cooper (Or. 1876)
- Hunt v. City of San Francisco (Cal. 1858)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.
Although a party may set up an equitable defence to an action at law, his remedy is not confined to that proceeding. He may let the judgment go at law and file his bill in equity for relief. Our practice, while it enlarges the field of remedy, does not take away pre-existing remedies by implication. «
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.