Macy v. Goodwin
Macy v. Goodwin
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Murray and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
This case must he reversed on the authority of Beach v. McCann, 2 Cal., and the Executors of Folsom v. Scott at this term.
The counsel for respondents urges that these deeds and power of attorney, copies of which were given in evidence, were immaterial to the decision of the cause on account of the subsequent testimony of a witness. This may be so, but we cannot know it unless we had some mode of ascertaining whether the judge who tried the case gave as much weight to the one kind of evidence as to the other.
' Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MACY v. GOODWIN
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Section 21 of the Act of March, 1851, giving to copies of papers from the county recorder’s office the like effect as evidence as originals, does not dispense with the production of the originals if they can be obtained; it merely fixes the value of the copy as evidence, when it is necessary to be introduced, from the loss of the original. There is no attempt by this section to dispense with the rule, that the best evidence must be resorted to which the nature of the case will admit.