Bours v. Webster
California Supreme Court
Bours v. Webster, 6 Cal. 660 (Cal. 1856)
Murray
Bours v. Webster
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
The instructions given by the Court below, at the request of the defendants, as we think, are repugnant and contradictory to those before given, at the instance of the plaintiff, and were calculated to mislead the jury.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- BOURS v. WEBSTER
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Growing crops are not goods or chattels, within the meaning of the Statute of Frauds, and will pass by deed or conveyance, from the very necessity of the case, as they are not susceptible of manual delivery until harvested and reduced to actual possession.