Bours v. Webster

California Supreme Court
Bours v. Webster, 6 Cal. 660 (Cal. 1856)
Murray

Bours v. Webster

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray.

Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt and Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

*664Crops, growing upon land, are not goods and chattels, within the meaning of the Statute of Frauds, and will pass by deed or conveyance, from the very necessity of the case, as they are not susceptible of manual delivery until harvested and reduced to actual possession.

The instructions given by the Court below, at the request of the defendants, as we think, are repugnant and contradictory to those before given, at the instance of the plaintiff, and were calculated to mislead the jury.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
BOURS v. WEBSTER
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Growing crops are not goods or chattels, within the meaning of the Statute of Frauds, and will pass by deed or conveyance, from the very necessity of the case, as they are not susceptible of manual delivery until harvested and reduced to actual possession.