Graham v. Endicott
Graham v. Endicott
7 Cal. 144
Graham v. Endicott
Opinion of the Court
after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, J., and Burnett, J., concurring.
The complaint was demurred to, and the demurrer properly sustained. There was no relation between the present plaintiff and Endicott that would render him officially liable. Although responsible to Adams & Co., he was, so far as the plaintiff is concerned, a mere bailee of Adams & Co., and could only be garnisheed as a private individual.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.