Benedict v. Bunnell
California Supreme Court
Benedict v. Bunnell, 7 Cal. 245 (Cal. 1857)
Burnett
Benedict v. Bunnell
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.
The defendant executed a note and mortgage to plaintiff. At the date of the note and mortgage, the defendant was a married man, but his wife was not then a resident of this State.
The only question in this case was settled in the case of Cary v. Tice and wife, decided at the last term of this Court. “ The premises never were impressed with the character of a homestead until actual residence upon them hy the family/-’
So much of the judgment of the Court below as is appealed from is reversed, and that Court will enter judgment in accordance with this opinion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- BENEDICT v. BUNNELL
- Cited By
- 10 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Premises never assume the character of a homestead until actual residence thereon by the family. Where the wife, at the date of the execution of the mortgage, was not a resident of the State, the homestead right cannot be sustained. The case of Carey v. Tice, affirmed.