California Supreme Court, 1857

Hopkins v. Delaney

Hopkins v. Delaney
California Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1857 · Burnett, Murray
8 Cal. 85; 1857 Cal. LEXIS 300

Counsel

Judah for Appellants., Waller & Osborne, and S. M. Bowman, for Respondent.

Hopkins v. Delaney

Opinion of the Court

Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

The plaintiff filed his bill to foreclose two mortgages. The defendants set up a claim of homestead.

The only questions raised by the record are : First, whether the recorder of San Francisco was authorized by law to take acknowledgments of conveyances, which authority is expressly given by statute; and, Second, whether the acknowledgment is sufficient. The officer certifies that the parties were known to him; the appellant contends that the word “ personally ” should have been used. We have before decided that such a certificate was sufficient. The points on which the appellant relies are frivolous, and the appeal was evidently taken for delay.

Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.