California Supreme Court, 1857

Swift v. Muygridge

Swift v. Muygridge
California Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1857 · Burnett, Field, Terry
8 Cal. 445
Swift v. Muygridge

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

This was an action upon an undertaking executed by the defendants, to release property attached in a suit in a Justice’s Court, in which the plaintiff had judgment. The action was tried by the Court, and among its findings of fact there is none as to thp release of the property attached and its delivery to the defendant in the attachment-suit; and this omission is now urged by the appellant as fatal to the judgment. The position is not tenable. The release of the property by the constable, and its surrender tq the defendant in that suit, .are distinctly alleged in the complaint, and admitted in the answer. There can be no necessity of a finding as to a fact admitted by the pleadings. The finding is required only when an allegation of a material fact in the complaint is controverted by the answer, so as to *446raise an issue. The findings of fact by the Court are like a special verdict of a jury. They must be taken, in connection with the pleadings, to support the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.