People v. Ah Ti
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. v. Miller Mendel, Inc. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2025)
- Rossi v. Caire (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
- In re Estate of Pusey (Cal. 1918)
- Ward v. Marshall (Cal. 1892)
- Myers v. McDonald (Cal. 1885)
- Ryan v. Tomlinson (Cal. 1870)
- Argenti v. City of San Francisco (Cal. 1866)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of grand larceny. The only error assigned is that the testimony did not justify the verdict.
The rule is well settled that where there is no legal testimony to sustain the verdict, it will be set aside; but where the testimony is conflicting, or where the credibility of witnesses must be passed upon, it is a matter solely for the jury to determine. In this case, we think the jury might have found the defendant guilty or not guilty, and the Court would not have been justified in granting a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.