Ortman v. Dixon
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hennessy v. Superior Court (Cal. 1924)
- Wilkinson v. Dunkley-Williams Co. (Mich. 1905)
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F. (Cal. 1904)
- Crocker v. Conrey (Cal. 1903)
- Montgomery v. Palmer (Mich. 1894)
- State ex rel. Millett v. Field (Mo. Ct. App. 1889)
- State ex rel. Thatcher v. Horner (Mo. Ct. App. 1884)
- Heinlen v. Cross (Cal. 1883)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Application for mandamus to the Judge of the Tuba District Court.
This was a chancery suit, in which a decree was rendered for plaintiffs, perpetually enjoining the defendants from diverting the waters of Mill Creek. Pending a motion for a new trial, the defendants violated the injunction, and plaintiffs applied for an attachment against them for contempt of Court, which was refused upon the ground that the pending of the motion operated as a suspension of the injunction.
We think that this was error. Let a peremptory mandamus issue.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.