Tarpey v. Shillenberger
Tarpey v. Shillenberger
Opinion of the Court
Terry, C., J., and Field, J., concurring.
This suit was brought in the Third District, upon an undertaking entered into by defendants, as sureties for other parties, on the latter obtaining an injunction. The condition of the undertaking is, that the plaintiffs in the suit for whom the sureties
The judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- TARPEY v. SHILLENBERGERs.
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- In an action against the sureties on an injunction-bond, the condition of which is, that the plaintiffs in the suit for whom the sureties undertook, should pay all damages and costs that should he awarded against the plaintiff by virtue of the issuing of said injunction by any competent Court, and the complaint did not aver that any damages had been awarded: Held, that such complaint is fatally defective. The sureties are entitled to stand on the precise terms of the contract, and there is no way of extending their liability beyond the stipulation to which they have chosen to bind themselves.