In re Estate of Taylor
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Connell v. Tack (Wash. 1936)
- Estate of Grant (Cal. 1935)
- Estate of Taylor (Cal. 1860)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Terry, C. J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The statute requires, in general terms, claims against the estates of deceased persons to be presented to the executor or administrator within ten months after the publication of notice for the presentation of claims, and if allowed, to be then presented to the Probate Judge for his approval; but provides that where the executor or administrator is himself a creditor, the presentation shall be made to the Probate Judge in the first instance. The only difference between the claims of an executor or administrator, and those of other creditors, is that the latter must be presented to both the executor or administrator and the Probate Judge, and the former only to the Judge. It would, indeed, be a useless provision to require the executor or administrator to allow his own claim. We are of opinion that the period within
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.