Primm v. Gray
California Supreme Court
Primm v. Gray, 10 Cal. 522 (Cal. 1858)
Terry
Primm v. Gray
Opinion of the Court
Field, J., and Baldwin, J., concurring.
The first and second assignments of error are not supported by the record.
The third is not well taken. To support a plea in abatement
The fourth is not supported by the record. Upon the whole, it appears that the appeal was taken merely for delay, and the judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PRIMM v. GRAY
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- To support a plea in abatement founded on the pendency of a prior action, it is necessary to show that process was issued in such action.*