Heston v. Martin
California Supreme Court
Heston v. Martin, 11 Cal. 41 (Cal. 1858)
Baldwin
Heston v. Martin
Opinion of the Court
Field J., conccurring.
This appeal is without merit, and it is apparent that the only point seriously urged by the appellant—to wit: that an account is necessary, giving the items of work and materials in the statement of lien filed— cannot be maintained in case of a contract for a sum in gross.
Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HESTON v. MARTIN
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- In a mechanic’s lien, it is not necessary to give the items of the work and materials, in the statement of the lien filed, where the contract for the construction of the building is in a sum in gross.