Brotherton v. Hart

California Supreme Court July 1, 1858

Brotherton v. Hart, 11 Cal. 405 (Cal. 1858)

Terry

Opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., at the July Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court—

Field, J., concurring.

In this case the parties, by stipulation, consented that the motion for a new trial should be denied. Having consented to the order, they cannot now question its correctness. (Meerholtz v. Sessions, 9 Cal. 277.)

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name: BROTHERTON v. HART
Cited By: 5 cases
Status: Published
Syllabus: Where the parties in the Court below stipulated that a motion for a new trial should be denied, they cannot question, in this Court, the correctness of an order denying such motion.