California Supreme Court, 1858

Brotherton v. Hart

California Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1858 · Terry

11 Cal. 405

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Gallegos v. Kia Motors CA4/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)
Gibson v. Berryman (Cal. Ct. App. 1910)
Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire (Cal. 1907)
City & County San Francisco v. Certain Real Estate (Cal. 1872)
Mecham v. McKay (Cal. 1869)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., at the July Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court—

Field, J., concurring.

In this case the parties, by stipulation, consented that the motion for a new trial should be denied. Having consented to the order, they cannot now question its correctness. (Meerholtz v. Sessions, 9 Cal. 277.)

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.