Brotherton v. Hart
Brotherton v. Hart
11 Cal. 405
Brotherton v. Hart
Opinion of the Court
Field, J., concurring.
In this case the parties, by stipulation, consented that the motion for a new trial should be denied. Having consented to the order, they cannot now question its correctness. (Meerholtz v. Sessions, 9 Cal. 277.)
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.