Heihn v. Stansbury
Heihn v. Stansbury
12 Cal. 412
Heihn v. Stansbury
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court—Baldwin, J., concurring.
The appeal from the order denying a new trial was not taken within the time prescribed by law, and cannot be considered by the Court.
Upon the appeal from the judgment, no statement was filed until a year after judgment was rendered; therefore, we can only consider the judgment roll, which discloses no error.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.