Jones v. Martin
Jones v. Martin
16 Cal. 165; 1860 Cal. LEXIS 198
Jones v. Martin
Opinion of the Court
Field, C. J. and Cope, J. concurring.
We think the Court erred in excluding the deed in this case. Take the transcript altogether, and we think it shows sufficiently that the seal of the Notary was affixed to the instrument. The certificate asserts
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.