People v. Mills
People v. Mills
17 Cal. 276
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Deibel v. Kinnear (Ohio Ct. App. 1934)
- Raudabaugh v. Hart (Ohio 1899)
- People v. Rangod (Cal. 1896)
- Murphy v. State (Ind. 1889)
- United States v. Cannon (Utah 1885)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Baldwin, J. concurring.
The .'indictment is sufficient. It charges that the defendant, unlawfully and feloniously had carnal knowledge of a female child under ten years of age. The facts constituting the offense are stated with sufficient precision.
There is nothing in the other points made. The presumptions are in favor of the regularity of the proceedings.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.