McGinley v. Hardy
McGinley v. Hardy
18 Cal. 115
McGinley v. Hardy
Opinion of the Court
Field, C. J. concurring.
We have examined the record in this case, and find no error for which the judgment should be reversed. The alterations in the plan of the building constitute a sufficient answer to any claim on the part of the defendant growing out of a failure to complete the contract within the time specified. The circumstances show very clearly a modification of the contract in' this respect.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.