Dexter v. Paugh
Dexter v. Paugh
18 Cal. 372; 1861 Cal. LEXIS 199
Opinion of the Court
Field, C. J. concurring.
1. The Court erred in allowing proof of injury to plaintiff’s business as a criterion of damage against the Sheriff, and the charge in connection with this ruling. (See Nightingale v. Scannell, recently decided. 2. The Court also erred in excluding the attachment papers in the case of Bosworth & Co. v. Ludekins.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.