Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson
Tuolumne Redemption Co. v. Patterson
18 Cal. 415; 1861 Cal. LEXIS 217
Opinion of the Court
Field, C. J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.
The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment upon the complaint; and the Court erred in requiring proof of the facts therein stated. The complaint" was verified, and the failure of the defendant to answer was an admission of the facts charged. No proof was necessary to enable the Court to render the proper judgment.
Judgment reversed and" cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.