People v. Sears
People v. Sears
Opinion of the Court
Cope, J. concurring.
Judgment affirmed. The Court had a right to make the rule, for its own government and that of counsel; and we see nothing in this case to show any such unjust and injurious operation of it as to induce us to interfere, if we could do so in any case, to reverse a judgment because it had been enforced in a particular instance.
It is true that injustice may be done a defendant in some cases by refusing to consider instructions because not offered before the argument, since such instructions may be necessary in consequence of the propositions or argument of the prosecuting attorney. In such cases, the Court should either give the instructions of defendant, or make such explanations of its own as would put the law correctly before the jury.
A conclusive answer is, that the instructions are not correct. It is immaterial whether the reason for - refusing the instructions be good or not, as we do not try the sufficiency of the arguments of the Judge, but only the soundness of his conclusions.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THE PEOPLE v. SEARS
- Cited By
- 10 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Courts have the right to make a rule, in criminal cases, that written instructions must bo handed to the Court before the argument of the case commences. Query: whether a judgment of conviction will be reversed in any case because such a rule was enforced. Where injustice would be done a defendant by refusing to consider instructions because not offered before the argument—as where such instructions may be necessary in consequence of the propositions or argument of the District Attorney—the Court should either give the instructions asked by defendant, or so explain its own as to put the law correctly before the jury. In this case, the instructions asked are not correct, and hence defendant cannot assign the refusal to give them as error, the reason for refusing them being immaterial.