Dooling v. Moore
Dooling v. Moore
Opinion of the Court
When the appeal in this case was dismissed at the October term, it was without prejudice to a second appeal. (19 Cal. 81.) This reservation was not intended to give any right of which the statute had deprived the appellant. The Court could not enlarge the time for appealing. The reservation was only intended to prevent the dismissal from operating as a bar to a second appeal, if the time prescribed by statute had not expired.
Rehearing granted, but without costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DOOLING v. MOORE
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Where an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, rendered on appeal from a Justice's Court, is taken after the lapse of more than ninety days from the rendition of the judgment, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction of the case. The Supreme Court cannot enlarge the time fixed by statute for taking an appeal.