Hestres v. Clements
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Polack v. McGrath (Cal. 1867)
- 338 South Avenue 16 v. Meyer CA2/5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2024)
- Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telelegraph Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)
- Oil Tool Exchange, Inc. v. Schuh (Cal. Ct. App. 1944)
- Davidson v. Graham (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
- Cutler v. Haycock (Utah 1907)
- Sawtelle v. Muncy (Cal. 1897)
- Nagle v. Wakey (Ill. 1896)
- In re McIntire Estate (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1894)
- Calderwood v. Tevis (Cal. 1863)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Norton, J. concurring.
The judgment in this case must be reversed for irregularity in the proceedings. When the judgment was entered there was a demurrer on file which had not been disposed of. Two of the defendants demurred separately, and the record shows that but one of the demurrers was acted upon. The other was filed after a default had been taken, but the attorneys for the plaintiffs accepted service of it, thereby waiving the default.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.