Buckman v. Whitney
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- City & County of San Francisco v. Carraro (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)
- Jackson v. Dolan (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
- Beggs v. Superior Court (Cal. 1918)
- Territory of Hawaii v. Watanabe Masagi (Haw. 1904)
- Miller v. State (Ark. 1883)
- Bonds v. Hickman (Cal. 1866)
- Buckman v. Whitney (Cal. 1865)
- Brooks v. Lubbock (Cal. 1865)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal in this case on the ground that the transcript has not been filed in this Court. Affidavits are presented upon both sides, from which it appears that the transcript has not been made out by the Clerk of the Court below, because of the loss from the files of said Court
Upon proper application being made, it will he the duty of the Court below to supply the lost judgment roll by the aid of the copies, or by some other means under its control.
It is therefore ordered that the appellants have thirty days from and after the next term of the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, for the County of Solano, in which to prepare and file in this Court the transcript on appeal in this cause, and that in the meantime all proceedings on the said motion in this Court be stayed.
Mr. Justice Shatter, having been of counsel, did not sit on the trial of this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.